<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <title>Blog about IT, development, and refactoring</title>
 <subtitle>Tips</subtitle>
 <link href="http://www.christianbrink.com/" />
 <link rel="self" href="http://www.christianbrink.com/atom.xml" />
 <updated>2009-03-30T20:42:27Z</updated>
 <author>
   <name>Steve Kemp</name>
   <uri>http://www.christianbrink.com/</uri>
 </author>
 <icon>http://www.christianbrink.com/favicon.ico</icon>
 <id>http://www.christianbrink.com/</id>

 
  <entry>
   <id>http://www.christianbrink.com/articles/2</id>
   <title>Refactoring Talk and Slides</title>
   <link href="http://www.christianbrink.com/articles/2" />
   <updated>2009-03-23T21:16:34Z</updated>
   <summary>I have posted my slides (http://christianbrink.com/refactoring_presentation.pdf) and code samples (http://www.christianbrink.com/refactor.txt) for my refactoring talk &quot;A beginner&#39;s guide to refactoring&quot;. This is a very broad but shallow look at refactoring.</summary>
   <author>
    <name>cbrink</name>
    <uri>http://www.christianbrink.com/users/cbrink</uri>
   </author>

 </entry>
 
  <entry>
   <id>http://www.christianbrink.com/articles/1</id>
   <title>Commented code != self-documented code</title>
   <link href="http://www.christianbrink.com/articles/1" />
   <updated>2009-03-30T20:42:27Z</updated>
   <summary>I just finished reading &lt;em&gt;Refactoring - Improving the design of existing code&lt;/em&gt; by Martin Fowler. And it amazed me how much of it mirrors my experiences and my methods for refactoring. Both of us sync on all the same major points. I do have some minor issues with it but overall it&#39;s been great read. I think it speaks highly to the veracity of refactoring, as an integral way of improving code, that the same conclusions are continually reached independently. I highly recommend reading this book</summary>
   <author>
    <name>cbrink</name>
    <uri>http://www.christianbrink.com/users/cbrink</uri>
   </author>

 </entry>
 

</feed>

